<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chalk, Newspapers, and Oblivion &#8211; Further Thoughts on Self-Publishing.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>I agree that there will be newspapers in the future, just as there will be publishers in the future. But neither the publishers nor the newspapers will be anything like what we have today. In order to make enough money to survive, they will have to provide a value to their customers. They will have to provide a value that cannot be obtained by the faster, cheaper, more interactive and nimble models offered by electronic transfer of information.

I don&#039;t pretend to know what direction the newspapers will have to look to find that value, but the publishers of the future will find themselves hard put to compete against increasingly competent self-publishing models. In order to compete, they will have to begin seeing authors as clients to be served, and not as a resource to be exploited.

Levi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there will be newspapers in the future, just as there will be publishers in the future. But neither the publishers nor the newspapers will be anything like what we have today. In order to make enough money to survive, they will have to provide a value to their customers. They will have to provide a value that cannot be obtained by the faster, cheaper, more interactive and nimble models offered by electronic transfer of information.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t pretend to know what direction the newspapers will have to look to find that value, but the publishers of the future will find themselves hard put to compete against increasingly competent self-publishing models. In order to compete, they will have to begin seeing authors as clients to be served, and not as a resource to be exploited.</p>
<p>Levi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Woolf</title>
		<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Woolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>While I agree that most of the major newspapers are heading for oblivion, it is mainly because they have not been listening to their readers. Look at what readers said when the San Jose MercNews admitted it had problems: 
http://forums.mercurynews.com/topic/cassidy-its-time-for-a-frank-talk-with-readers-about-mercury-news?source=article#comment-286529 or http://bit.ly/1Ot4x3

Many communities are starting community newspapers which serve their needs. Often they are entirely voluntary, and sometimes just photocopied, but almost universally they have one thing in common -- despite being run in conjunction with some often very good web sites, they are on paper. 

Our first info on major news will come via radio, tv and the internet, perhaps via sites like the new Google fast flip at http://fastflip.googlelabs.com/ (though there&#039;s much to do both by Google and the sites they point to).

Newspapers will be here in the future but they will not be today&#039;s monoliths. We may actually get the so-called community press back to the community.

What does remain a problem is that most local publications will sooner or later want to include information from around the nation or around the world, and the big boys&#039; ownership of the news agencies and restrictions on reprinting except by themselves that there seem great problems in ensuring that the original writers of stories will receive anything. And I&#039;d guess that will gbe especially important to people such as you (and me).
.-= Gordon Woolf&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gordonwoolf.com/2009/09/does-punctuation-matter.html&quot;&gt;Does punctuation matter?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that most of the major newspapers are heading for oblivion, it is mainly because they have not been listening to their readers. Look at what readers said when the San Jose MercNews admitted it had problems:<br />
<a href="http://forums.mercurynews.com/topic/cassidy-its-time-for-a-frank-talk-with-readers-about-mercury-news?source=article#comment-286529">http://forums.mercurynews.com/topic/cassidy-its-time-for-a-frank-talk-with-readers-about-mercury-news?source=article#comment-286529</a> or <a href="http://bit.ly/1Ot4x3">http://bit.ly/1Ot4x3</a></p>
<p>Many communities are starting community newspapers which serve their needs. Often they are entirely voluntary, and sometimes just photocopied, but almost universally they have one thing in common &#8212; despite being run in conjunction with some often very good web sites, they are on paper. </p>
<p>Our first info on major news will come via radio, tv and the internet, perhaps via sites like the new Google fast flip at <a href="http://fastflip.googlelabs.com/">http://fastflip.googlelabs.com/</a> (though there&#8217;s much to do both by Google and the sites they point to).</p>
<p>Newspapers will be here in the future but they will not be today&#8217;s monoliths. We may actually get the so-called community press back to the community.</p>
<p>What does remain a problem is that most local publications will sooner or later want to include information from around the nation or around the world, and the big boys&#8217; ownership of the news agencies and restrictions on reprinting except by themselves that there seem great problems in ensuring that the original writers of stories will receive anything. And I&#8217;d guess that will gbe especially important to people such as you (and me).<br />
.-= Gordon Woolf&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.gordonwoolf.com/2009/09/does-punctuation-matter.html">Does punctuation matter?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s embarrassing! In my (meager) defense, I wrote this post on my BlackBerry Storm, and I added that sentence late in the game. Anyway, they&#039;re fixed now.

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s embarrassing! In my (meager) defense, I wrote this post on my BlackBerry Storm, and I added that sentence late in the game. Anyway, they&#8217;re fixed now.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Rutherford</title>
		<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Rutherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/17/chalk-newspapers-and-oblivion-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Note two typos in 2nd to last paragraph.
.-= Todd Rutherford&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://publishingguru.blogspot.com/2009/09/developing-fictional-character.html&quot;&gt;Developing A Fictional Character&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Note two typos in 2nd to last paragraph.<br />
.-= Todd Rutherford&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://publishingguru.blogspot.com/2009/09/developing-fictional-character.html">Developing A Fictional Character</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

