<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographers, Musicians, and Authors &#8211; Further Thoughts on Self-Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/20/photographers-musicians-and-authors-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/20/photographers-musicians-and-authors-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gorzek</title>
		<link>http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/20/photographers-musicians-and-authors-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>gorzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.levimontgomery.com/index.php/2009/09/20/photographers-musicians-and-authors-further-thoughts-on-self-publishing/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>I have brought this up before, believe me. There is absolutely a double-standard when it comes to this sort of thing.

But think about it. Who stands to benefit from the perception that we &quot;need&quot; a traditional publishing model? Who is against self-publishing?

Agents are against it. They stand to lose money.

Publishers are against it. They stand to lose money.

Marketing firms are against it. Who is going to pay for a release blitz without the big publishers around?

Established authors are against it. They don&#039;t want the increased competition. I don&#039;t blame people like Stephen King for being against self-publishing, although I think his opinion of it is self-serving and more than a little dishonest.

The public is smart enough to decide what music they like. Even independent movies get a lot of attention--how many times now have we had an instance where someone self-financed a movie for a paltry sum of money, then it became a hit? We think &quot;going it alone&quot; is just fine for essentially every other form of art, but when it comes to publishing, oh no! We can&#039;t have the public deciding what *books* they like!

The publishing industry needs to decentralize just like the music industry is doing. We *don&#039;t* need the middlemen--certainly not as many as we used to. The tools are there to do it all yourself. Is a lot of it going to be crap? Of course! But the public will decide what they do and don&#039;t want to pay for. And that&#039;s how it should be.
.-= gorzek&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://gorzek.com/fiction/misc/finished/over-and-out/&quot;&gt;Over and Out&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have brought this up before, believe me. There is absolutely a double-standard when it comes to this sort of thing.</p>
<p>But think about it. Who stands to benefit from the perception that we &#8220;need&#8221; a traditional publishing model? Who is against self-publishing?</p>
<p>Agents are against it. They stand to lose money.</p>
<p>Publishers are against it. They stand to lose money.</p>
<p>Marketing firms are against it. Who is going to pay for a release blitz without the big publishers around?</p>
<p>Established authors are against it. They don&#8217;t want the increased competition. I don&#8217;t blame people like Stephen King for being against self-publishing, although I think his opinion of it is self-serving and more than a little dishonest.</p>
<p>The public is smart enough to decide what music they like. Even independent movies get a lot of attention&#8211;how many times now have we had an instance where someone self-financed a movie for a paltry sum of money, then it became a hit? We think &#8220;going it alone&#8221; is just fine for essentially every other form of art, but when it comes to publishing, oh no! We can&#8217;t have the public deciding what *books* they like!</p>
<p>The publishing industry needs to decentralize just like the music industry is doing. We *don&#8217;t* need the middlemen&#8211;certainly not as many as we used to. The tools are there to do it all yourself. Is a lot of it going to be crap? Of course! But the public will decide what they do and don&#8217;t want to pay for. And that&#8217;s how it should be.<br />
.-= gorzek&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://gorzek.com/fiction/misc/finished/over-and-out/">Over and Out</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

