About the author...

MWhere I’ll be:M

----------

3rd Annual NW Book Festival

Saturday, July 28, 2012
10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Pioneer Courthouse Square, Portland, OR
(corner of SW Morrison and SW Sixth Avenue)

----------

The 2012 Northwest Author Fair

Saturday, August 25, 2012
11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
In the plaza next to Bob’s Beach Books
1747 NW Hwy 101, Lincoln City, OR

----------

...

Writers vs Readers – Part N

I know I’ve covered this before, but I’m too lazy too check.

Hey, I’m getting old. I get to indulge in repetitive blather. And one of the soap boxes I like to climb is that old favorite, “Who am I writing for?” In my Google Reader this morning, I came across New Launch: Peer Critique Studio. Now, I’m certainly not going to say that peer critique is useless or irrelevant. It isn’t. In fact, it may be necessary. And I have no opinion on this particular critique group, since I’m not a member, and I don’t subscribe to the common belief that “Everyone has a right to their own opinion.” Sorry, you don’t. You only have a right to an opinion if a) the topic is a matter of opinion, not fact, and b) you have taken the time to educate yourself on the topic. I have no “right to an opinion” regarding the relative weight of water vs steel in Earth’s gravitational field, I have no “right to an opinion” of whether your Great-Auntie Grace is crazy or not, because I don’t know her, and I have no “right to an opinion” regarding any group of which I know nothing.

I do, however, have a right to an opinion regarding whom I’d rather please, and, in fact, whom I must please as a writer: readers or other writers. I have no problem with pleasing both, of course, but when I set myself the task of writing a complete novella from exactly one (count it, one!) viewpoint, with absolutely no violations allowed, I’d rather hear from the reader with no pretensions to being a writer, who said “I like the way you can see the duality between what the other characters really want and what the main character thinks they want, even though you never see their thoughts,” than from the writer who said “You will stagnate as an author until you learn to handle multiple viewpoints.” I’d rather hear from the reader who told me exactly how the story had made her feel than the writer who says “Show, don’t tell.” (Oh, don’t get me started! If you want to claim to be a writer, learn a better way to say “Tell about these things, not about those things,” than “Show, don’t tell.” It’s writing. It’s words. Words can only tell, they cannot show. We don’t call it storyshowing.)

If I were a cabinetmaker, and I made new kitchen cabinets for your house, if you were just a normal person who cooks and cleans and stores things, you’d have one take on those cabinets, and if you were a cabinetmaker, you’d have another. I’m not going to say that either way of looking at cabinets or stories is wrong, or that either way is more significant or meaningful, but unless you plan to only sell your cabinets to the other cabinetmakers of the world, you’d better learn to please the people who cook and clean and store things.

 

Share

6 comments to Writers vs Readers – Part N

  • Whether you have said it before or not – it is still good advice. I guess I talk to different people depending on what I want to know. If I want to know whether my characters are likeable and if the story flows, I’ll ask a reader. If I want to get some help picking up the technical details of the writing, I’ll ask a writer. Both opinions are helpful to a degree.
    Thanks for sharing.
    .-= Cassandra Jade´s last blog ..100+ Reading Challenge =-.

  • Oh, I wholeheartedly agree! There are times when it’s fun to discuss the relative merits of oak versus cherry, or why you like Kreg jigs or whether stainless hardware would have been better than brass.

    But if you just want to know “Can a cook who is 5′-2″ use this thing?” ask a cook, and if you want to know, not why a story is working, but if it is working, ask a reader.

  • Levi,

    In a completely Socratic spirit of asking, because you should know by now I have the utmost respect for you, I am simply wondering the following:

    If someone were to give you, Levi Montgomery, a book, then ask what you thought of it, would they be getting a response from a writer or from a reader?

    Cheers. I’ve dug your last set of posts.

    Pablo
    .-= Pablo D’Stair´s last blog ..This site has moved =-.

    • Pablo,

      That’s something I struggle with, actually. In my own “pleasure” reading, I generally simply read as a reader. If I don’t like it, I don’t read it, and I don’t worry too much about why I don’t. Life’s too short, and I’m too old, and there are far too many things to read, anyway.

      If someone gives me a book (which is what you asked), then I hope I try to divine the expectations of the person who gave it to me and respond accordingly. One thing I know I do is not try and take a story apart simply because I don’t like it. If you ask me to read something, and I think it’s a good story, worth telling, but your telling has some problems, I’ll point them out if I think that’s what you want, but if it simply doesn’t grab me, or if there’s no story there, or if it is so experimental or avant garde that I can’t make heads or tails of it, then I’m not going to be any help, so I try to say nothing at all.

  • Well-said. I have often thought about the same thing.